Cleveland Suburban Hockey League,
event management software, League administration software, Club
management software, Club management software,Club administration
software, Online Registration, Facility Management Software, League
website, Club website, web-based, registration software, league
scheduling software, database, registration, schedules, standings,
player statistics
|
 |
|

|
|
|
  |
 |
| 2010 CSHL RPI Rankings Version 3-FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
If a coach is not happy with his placement, he should talk to his program head about filing a petition. |
|
|
|
| 2 |
The deadline for filing a petition is very tight, Monday night 8pm, so do not delay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
The level breakdowns are done by computer to minimize the aggregate spread between |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the 1st and last team in each proposed level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Exclamation Point (!) after Rank indicates move of 4 or more spots up or down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
V3 Rankings include 513 games out of total of 531 (97%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CSHL MITE RPI V3-FINAL (10-24-10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 Teams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V3-Rev |
8-9-8-7-7 (changed fr 6 levels to 5 levels) [See Below] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
V3 |
6-7-6-7-7-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
V2 |
7-6-6-6-8-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MW Scaled |
Walkush Scaled |
RPI |
Rank |
|
Last Week Rank |
|
TEAM |
W |
L |
T |
AGD |
SCHED |
Midwest Raw |
Walkush Raw |
| 9.82 |
9.29 |
9.55 |
1 |
|
1 |
AA |
101 Winterhurst M1 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7.42 |
9.92 |
17.34 |
9.29 |
| 8.67 |
8.53 |
8.60 |
2 |
|
2 |
AA |
105 Rocky River M1 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
11.2 |
13.2 |
8.53 |
| 8.24 |
8.56 |
8.40 |
3 |
|
3 |
AA |
102 Strongsville M1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0.42 |
11.24 |
11.66 |
8.56 |
| 8.16 |
8.25 |
8.21 |
4 |
|
7 |
AA |
104 Gilmour M1 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
1.5 |
9.89 |
11.39 |
8.25 |
| 7.79 |
8.36 |
8.07 |
5 |
|
5 |
AA |
109 Columbus Capitals M1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3.42 |
6.61 |
10.03 |
8.36 |
| 8.03 |
8.09 |
8.06 |
6 |
|
4 |
AA |
108 Cleveland Hts M1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1.33 |
9.57 |
10.9 |
8.09 |
| 7.88 |
7.87 |
7.88 |
7 |
|
8 |
AA |
106 Shaker Hts M1 Petition to AA-Approved |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1.71 |
8.65 |
10.36 |
7.87 |
| 7.80 |
7.81 |
7.80 |
8 |
|
6 |
AA |
107 Cleveland Skating Club M1 Petition to AA-Approved |
3 |
4 |
1 |
0.5 |
9.58 |
10.08 |
7.81 |
| 7.01 |
7.57 |
7.29 |
9 |
|
10 |
A1 |
111 Mentor M1 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
7.23 |
7.23 |
7.57 |
| 6.93 |
7.11 |
7.02 |
10 |
|
9 |
A1 |
110 North Olmsted M1 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
6.95 |
6.95 |
7.11 |
| 6.63 |
6.32 |
6.47 |
11 |
|
11 |
A1 |
103 Elyria M1 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
-5.71 |
11.56 |
5.85 |
6.32 |
| 6.01 |
6.85 |
6.43 |
12 |
|
15 |
A1 |
114 Wooster M1 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1.14 |
2.51 |
3.65 |
6.85 |
| 6.36 |
6.44 |
6.40 |
13 |
|
12 |
A1 |
118 Parma M1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1.8 |
3.09 |
4.89 |
6.44 |
| 5.93 |
6.58 |
6.26 |
14 |
|
14 |
A1 |
119 Parma M2 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
2.9 |
0.46 |
3.36 |
6.58 |
| 5.96 |
6.36 |
6.16 |
15 |
|
16 |
A1 |
112 Columbus Blue Jackets M1 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
-0.87 |
4.34 |
3.47 |
6.36 |
| 5.83 |
6.37 |
6.10 |
16 |
|
13 |
A1 |
113 Winterhurst M2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
-0.5 |
3.47 |
2.97 |
6.37 |
| 5.47 |
6.59 |
6.03 |
17 |
|
17 |
A1 |
116 Strongsville M2 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
-2.66 |
4.36 |
1.7 |
6.59 |
| 5.44 |
6.20 |
5.82 |
18 |
|
18 |
A2 |
122 Canton-Akron M1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
2.28 |
-0.68 |
1.6 |
6.20 |
| 5.19 |
6.25 |
5.72 |
19 |
|
19 |
A2 |
117 Rocky River M2 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
-2.75 |
3.44 |
0.69 |
6.25 |
| 4.68 |
5.48 |
5.08 |
20 |
|
20 |
A2 |
120 Gilmour M2 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
-0.71 |
-0.43 |
-1.14 |
5.48 |
| 4.46 |
5.43 |
4.95 |
21 |
|
22 |
A2 |
115 Tri-County M1 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
-5.77 |
3.82 |
-1.95 |
5.43 |
| 4.69 |
5.06 |
4.87 |
22 |
|
23 |
A2 |
124 Geauga M2 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
4.37 |
-5.49 |
-1.12 |
5.06 |
| 4.27 |
4.90 |
4.59 |
23 |
|
21 |
A2 |
123 Geauga M1 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
-0.33 |
-2.29 |
-2.62 |
4.90 |
| 4.52 |
3.90 |
4.21 |
24 |
|
24 |
A2 |
128 Shaker Hts M2 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
5.5 |
-7.23 |
-1.73 |
3.90 |
| 4.16 |
3.88 |
4.02 |
25 |
|
25 |
A2 |
121 Cleveland Hts M2 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
-1.4 |
-1.62 |
-3.02 |
3.88 |
| 3.65 |
3.40 |
3.53 |
26 |
|
28 |
A3 |
127 Winterhurst M3 Petition to move down Approved |
3 |
3 |
0 |
-0.33 |
-4.52 |
-4.85 |
3.40 |
| 3.12 |
3.59 |
3.36 |
27 |
|
26 |
A3 |
133 Mentor M2 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
-9.76 |
-6.76 |
3.59 |
| 3.41 |
3.12 |
3.26 |
28 |
|
27 |
A3 |
129 Euclid M1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
-8.74 |
-5.74 |
3.12 |
| 2.76 |
2.66 |
2.71 |
29 |
|
32 |
A3 |
130 Elyria M2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0.71 |
-8.79 |
-8.08 |
2.66 |
| 2.48 |
2.13 |
2.30 |
30 |
|
30 |
A3 |
134 Canton-Akron M2 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
3.16 |
-12.24 |
-9.08 |
2.13 |
| 2.30 |
2.23 |
2.27 |
31 |
|
31 |
A3 |
126 Rocky River M3 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
-4 |
-5.73 |
-9.73 |
2.23 |
| 2.24 |
2.19 |
2.21 |
32 |
|
29 |
A3 |
138 Gilmour M3 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
2.33 |
-12.28 |
-9.95 |
2.19 |
| 2.26 |
1.90 |
2.08 |
33 |
|
33 |
B |
125 Parma M3 Petition to move down Approved |
2 |
5 |
0 |
-4.28 |
-5.58 |
-9.86 |
1.90 |
| 2.16 |
1.18 |
1.67 |
34 |
! |
39 |
B |
131 North Olmsted M2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
-4.75 |
-5.47 |
-10.22 |
1.18 |
| 0.95 |
1.43 |
1.19 |
35 |
|
35 |
B |
140 Winterhurst M4 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
-1.33 |
-13.26 |
-14.59 |
1.43 |
| 1.02 |
1.28 |
1.15 |
36 |
|
34 |
B |
132 Tri-County M2 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
-5.16 |
-9.17 |
-14.33 |
1.28 |
| 0.91 |
1.32 |
1.12 |
37 |
|
36 |
B |
136 Garfield M1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
-1.8 |
-12.93 |
-14.73 |
1.32 |
| 0.56 |
0.87 |
0.72 |
38 |
|
38 |
B |
135 Cleveland Hts M3 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
-2.4 |
-13.59 |
-15.99 |
0.87 |
| 0.18 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
39 |
|
37 |
B |
139 Rocky River M4 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
-4.5 |
-12.87 |
-17.37 |
0.00 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Note: Because of various factors, including the petitions filed, the appropriate number of games, the talent breaks between levels and coaches and head of program suggestions, the board reviewed a 5 level mite division and compared it to the 6 level division shown in RPI-V2 and -V3. Our analysis showed a 5 level division divided the teams up more fairly and was a better fit for the mites. It also happened to effectively grant all 4 mite petitions.
|
| |
|
 |
|
 |